and punishment, to be delivered over to the Chinese Authorities. In the present case, the previous examination of the parties ended without obtaining "proof or admission of their guilt", and consequently "the question of delivering them over to the Chinese authorities" although mooted by the British chief magistrate was set aside by Sir Henry Pottinger as well from the insufficiency of testimony, as from the tacit abandonment, as Sir Henry Pottinger alleges by the Chinese Government, of any claim to Jurisdiction in such a case.
But whatever may be the actual state of things in this respect, it is desirable that Her Majesty's Government should clearly understand the position of this question of Jurisdiction over the Chinese subjects of Hong Kong; and therefore I should wish you to enquire and report what may have passed between Sir Henry Pottinger and the Chinese Plenipotentiary in this matter, subsequently to the date of his despatch No. 92, and on what is founded the statement in his despatch to Lord Stanley that the Chinese Government have tacitly waived the claim to such Jurisdiction.
You will readily understand that although Her Majesty's Government wish to know the real state of the case, they have no desire that you should provoke a discussion on the subject with the Chinese Government. Doubtless it would be more convenient that
and punishment, to be delivered
over to the thiciese Authorities. In the present case, the previous examination of the parties ended without obtaining " proof or admission of their guilt", and conseg
"
the question of delivering them over to the Chinese auttiorities" although mooted by the British thief magistrate was set aside by Sir Henry Pottinger as well from the insufficiency of testimony, as from the tacit abandonment, as Sir Henry Pollinger alleges by the Chemise Government, of any claim to Jurisdiction in such
a lase
But whatever may be the actual state of things in this respect
it is
desiral ! that Her Majesty's
>
very Government should clearly understand
the
7.4
the position of this question of Jurisdiction over the Chinese subjects of the Kor brown ; and therefore I should wish you to enquis and report what may have passed between Sir Henry Pottinges and the Chrices. Plenipotentiary in this matter, subsequently to the date of his desprit. W. 92, and at all ever oh what is founded the statement in his despatch to Lord Stanley that the
tacitly have Aniese Government hand waved the dain to such Jurisdiction -
You will readily mndentaud theat although Her Myty's Government wish to know the real state of the case, they have no desire that you shout provoke a discussion on the subject with the Chinese Government. Doubtless it would be more couvement
that
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.